The research

Evidence library

The studies and guidelines behind this website, each summarised the same way: who was studied, which product, how, what was found, and the limitations.

In plain language

Clinical high risk of psychosis is well described: most people who meet the criteria do not develop psychosis, and an updated meta-analysis estimated that about one in four do within three years (pooled estimate). Source: Salazar de Pablo et al. 2021 Psychological therapy is the recommended first step, but no treatment has been proven to prevent psychosis. Source: Davies et al. 2018

Research on cannabidiol (CBD) in psychosis is early: small, short studies of other CBD products, with mixed results. None of them used NWPT-SM32300. Evidence about NWPT-SM32300 itself so far comes only from a Phase 1 study in healthy volunteers, whose results are not yet published.

How evidence is labelled

These labels are used on the research sections of this website and on the study cards below, one label at a time. Negative, mixed, inconclusive and not-conducted findings are also flagged on the cards.

Established

Consistent evidence, systematic reviews, regulatory decisions or clinical guidelines.

Emerging evidence

Small, short or early studies. Informative, not confirmed.

Open question

Not yet known; what research aims to answer.

Programme information

Facts about NWPT-SM32300 and our own studies. Not an assessment of evidence strength.

Library

Clinical need

Clinical need

Established

The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review

Population
People meeting clinical high-risk criteria (review of the field)
Product
Not applicable
Design
Narrative state-of-the-art review
Finding
Describes how the high-risk state is defined and assessed, including attenuated psychotic symptoms and brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms.
Limitations
A narrative review, not a systematic estimate of outcomes.

Source: Fusar-Poli P, Borgwardt S, et al.. The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):107-120. DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269 · PubMed 23165428

Clinical need

Established

Prevalence of individuals at clinical high-risk of psychosis in the general population and clinical samples: systematic review and meta-analysis

Population
37,135 people assessed in 35 studies
Product
Not applicable
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Finding
Clinical high-risk states were uncommon in the general population (1.7%) and much more common among young people already seeking help from services (19.2%).
Limitations
Estimates depend on how and where people were sampled; confidence intervals are wide.

Source: Salazar de Pablo G, et al.. Prevalence of individuals at clinical high-risk of psychosis in the general population and clinical samples: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 2021;11(11):1544. DOI 10.3390/brainsci11111544 · PubMed 34827543

Current care

Current care

Established

Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management (CG178)

Population
Adults considered at increased risk of psychosis
Product
Not applicable
Design
National clinical guideline
Finding
Offer individual CBT, with or without family intervention. Do not offer antipsychotic medication to people at increased risk or to reduce the risk of or prevent psychosis.
Limitations
Applies in England; guidance differs elsewhere.

Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management (CG178). NICE clinical guideline. 2014. Official source

Current care

Established

Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: recognition and management (CG155)

Population
Children and young people considered at increased risk
Product
Not applicable
Design
National clinical guideline (updated 2016)
Finding
Consider individual CBT with or without family intervention. Do not offer antipsychotic medication for this purpose.
Limitations
Applies in England; guidance differs elsewhere.

Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: recognition and management (CG155). NICE clinical guideline. 2013. Official source

Prediction and outcomes

Prediction and outcomes

Established

At clinical high risk for psychosis: outcome for nonconverters

Population
People at clinical high risk who did not develop psychosis (NAPLS cohort)
Product
Not applicable
Design
Longitudinal follow-up of a multisite cohort
Finding
People who did not develop psychosis were a mixed group: some recovered, others kept milder symptoms and difficulties.
Limitations
One North American cohort; exact remission percentages not quoted here.

Source: Addington J, Cornblatt BA, Cadenhead KS, et al.. At clinical high risk for psychosis: outcome for nonconverters. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(8):800-805. DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10081191 · PubMed 21498462

Prediction and outcomes

Established

Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk

Population
People at clinical high risk in published cohorts
Product
Not applicable
Design
Meta-analysis
Finding
Pooled risk of developing psychosis rose over time: 18% at 6 months, 22% at 1 year, 29% at 2 years and 36% at 3 years.
Limitations
Earlier literature; transition rates in later studies were lower (see Salazar de Pablo et al. 2021).

Source: Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, et al.. Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(3):220-229.

Prediction and outcomes

Established

Probability of transition to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk: an updated meta-analysis

Population
9,222 people at clinical high risk in 130 studies
Product
Not applicable
Design
Meta-analysis reporting a pooled estimate and, separately, Kaplan–Meier cumulative transition probabilities
Finding
Pooled estimate: about one in four (25%) developed psychosis within 3 years. Kaplan–Meier cumulative estimates, a separate analysis: 8% at 6 months, 14% at 1 year, 20% at 2 years, 27% at 3 years and 35% at 10 years. Wide variation between studies.
Limitations
Estimates span different services and criteria; individual risk varies. The pooled and Kaplan–Meier results are separate analyses and are not combined into one series. Neither is interchangeable with the older Fusar-Poli 2012 pooled averages.

Source: Salazar de Pablo G, Radua J, Pereira J, et al.. Probability of transition to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk: an updated meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(9):970-978. DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0830 · PubMed 34259821

Interventions

Interventions

Not conducted

CANTOP-RCT: cannabidiol for people at clinical high risk of psychosis (study report)

Population
Planned: about 300 people at clinical high risk across UK sites
Product
CBD 600 mg/day vs placebo for 6 months (planned)
Design
Planned Phase IIb randomised trial
Finding
The trial was funded but did not start because the study medicine could not be supplied. It produced no efficacy results.
Limitations
Not an efficacy finding. Included because it explains why a larger trial is still missing.

Source: NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme. CANTOP-RCT: cannabidiol for people at clinical high risk of psychosis (study report). NIHR Journals Library. PubMed 40096425

Interventions

EstablishedInconclusive

Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Population
1,246 people at clinical high risk in 11 randomised trials
Product
Psychological, omega-3 and antipsychotic interventions
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Finding
CBT was associated with fewer transitions to psychosis at 12 months (risk ratio 0.54), on moderate-quality evidence. Evidence for other interventions was low quality. The review did not conclude that any specific intervention is proven.
Limitations
Small trials; evidence quality mostly low to moderate.

Source: Stafford MR, et al.. Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f185. DOI 10.1136/bmj.f185 · PubMed 23335473

Interventions

EstablishedInconclusive

Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis

Population
Randomised trials in people at clinical high risk
Product
Psychological, pharmacological and nutritional interventions
Design
Network meta-analysis
Finding
No evidence that any one preventive intervention works better than the others.
Limitations
Few, small trials per intervention.

Source: Davies C, et al.. Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):196-209. DOI 10.1002/wps.20526 · PubMed 29856551

Interventions

Established

Comprehensive versus usual community care for first-episode psychosis: 2-year outcomes from the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program

Population
404 people with first-episode psychosis at 34 US clinics
Product
Coordinated specialty care (NAVIGATE), not a medicine
Design
Cluster-randomised trial; 2 years
Finding
People receiving coordinated specialty care stayed in treatment longer and had better quality of life, symptoms and involvement in work or school; benefits were larger when untreated psychosis had been shorter.
Limitations
People with first-episode psychosis, not clinical high risk; US community clinics.

Source: Kane JM, et al.. Comprehensive versus usual community care for first-episode psychosis: 2-year outcomes from the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(4):362-372. DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050632 · PubMed 26481174

CBD research

CBD research

Established

Epidyolex 100 mg/ml oral solution: Summary of Product Characteristics

Population
Patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome or tuberous sclerosis complex
Product
Epidyolex (a different cannabidiol medicine)
Design
Regulatory product information
Finding
Licensed CBD medicine for certain severe epilepsies. Side effects include sleepiness and raised liver enzymes (especially with valproate); interacts with clobazam.
Limitations
Epilepsy populations at higher doses per kg; not evidence about psychosis.

Source: Epidyolex 100 mg/ml oral solution: Summary of Product Characteristics. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Official source

CBD research

Established

Trial of cannabidiol for drug-resistant seizures in the Dravet syndrome

Population
120 children and young adults with Dravet syndrome
Product
Purified oral CBD solution (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Finding
CBD 20 mg/kg/day reduced convulsive seizures versus placebo. Common side effects included diarrhoea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, sleepiness and abnormal liver tests.
Limitations
Epilepsy, not psychosis; cited here for safety information.

Source: Devinsky O, et al.. Trial of cannabidiol for drug-resistant seizures in the Dravet syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(21). DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1611618 · PubMed 28538134

CBD research

Established

The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study

Population
901 people with first-episode psychosis and 1,237 controls, 11 sites
Product
Street cannabis (THC), not CBD
Design
Case-control study
Finding
Daily cannabis use, and especially daily use of high-potency (high-THC) cannabis, was associated with higher odds of psychotic disorder.
Limitations
Association, not proof of cause; about THC-rich cannabis, not CBD.

Source: Di Forti M, et al.. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(5):427-. DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3 · PubMed 30902669

CBD research

Emerging evidence

Opposite effects of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology

Population
15 healthy men (plus 6 in a pretreatment experiment)
Product
Oral THC and CBD (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Experimental brain-imaging study
Finding
THC and CBD had opposite effects on activity in several brain regions; CBD pretreatment prevented THC-induced psychotic symptoms in a small group.
Limitations
Very small, healthy volunteers, single doses; mechanism, not clinical benefit.

Source: Bhattacharyya S, Morrison PD, Fusar-Poli P, et al.. Opposite effects of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:764-774. DOI 10.1038/npp.2009.184

CBD research

Emerging evidence

Cannabidiol (CBD) as an adjunctive therapy in schizophrenia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Population
88 adults with schizophrenia already taking antipsychotics
Product
Oral CBD solution, 1,000 mg/day (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled; 6 weeks
Finding
Positive psychotic symptoms fell more with CBD than placebo (small difference), and clinicians more often rated patients as improved. Generally well tolerated.
Limitations
Small, short, add-on treatment in established schizophrenia; not people at clinical high risk.

Source: McGuire P, Robson P, Cubala WJ, et al.. Cannabidiol (CBD) as an adjunctive therapy in schizophrenia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(3):225-231. DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17030325 · PubMed 29241357

CBD research

Emerging evidence

Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia

Population
42 inpatients with acute schizophrenia
Product
Oral CBD up to 800 mg/day (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, double-blind, active comparator (amisulpride); 4 weeks
Finding
Symptoms improved similarly with CBD and amisulpride; CBD had fewer movement side effects, less weight gain and a smaller prolactin rise.
Limitations
Small and short; no placebo group, so the size of any CBD effect alone is uncertain.

Source: Leweke FM, et al.. Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e94. DOI 10.1038/tp.2012.15 · PubMed 22832859

CBD research

Emerging evidenceNegative finding

The effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on cognition and symptoms in outpatients with chronic schizophrenia: a randomized placebo controlled trial

Population
36 outpatients with chronic schizophrenia
Product
Oral CBD 600 mg/day (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled; 6 weeks
Finding
No improvement in cognition or symptoms compared with placebo.
Limitations
Small; lower dose than some other studies; stable chronic patients.

Source: Boggs DL, Surti T, et al.. The effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on cognition and symptoms in outpatients with chronic schizophrenia: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018;235(7):1923-1932. DOI 10.1007/s00213-018-4885-9 · PubMed 29619533

CBD research

Emerging evidence

Effect of cannabidiol on medial temporal, midbrain, and striatal dysfunction in people at clinical high risk of psychosis: a randomized clinical trial

Population
33 people at clinical high risk (16 CBD, 17 placebo) and 19 healthy volunteers
Product
Single oral CBD 600 mg dose (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled brain-imaging study
Finding
During a memory task, brain activity with CBD was intermediate between the placebo group and healthy volunteers in several regions.
Limitations
Single dose; brain-activity measures, not symptoms or outcomes.

Source: Bhattacharyya S, et al.. Effect of cannabidiol on medial temporal, midbrain, and striatal dysfunction in people at clinical high risk of psychosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(11):1107-1117. DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2309

CBD research

Emerging evidenceMixed findings

Effects of short-term cannabidiol treatment on response to social stress in subjects at clinical high risk of developing psychosis

Population
32 people at clinical high risk and 26 healthy volunteers
Product
Oral CBD 600 mg/day for 7 days (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled experimental study
Finding
Anxiety and stress responses to a public-speaking test were intermediate between placebo and healthy volunteers. The cortisol response did not differ significantly from placebo.
Limitations
One week; laboratory stress test, not clinical outcomes.

Source: Appiah-Kusi E, et al.. Effects of short-term cannabidiol treatment on response to social stress in subjects at clinical high risk of developing psychosis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020. PubMed 31915861

CBD research

Emerging evidence

Effects of cannabidiol on symptoms in people at clinical high risk for psychosis

Population
33 people at clinical high risk (16 CBD, 17 placebo)
Product
Oral CBD 600 mg/day for 21 days (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Randomised, placebo-controlled; published as a short research letter
Finding
After adjusting for starting scores, symptom and distress scores were lower with CBD than placebo; CBD was well tolerated.
Limitations
Very small, three weeks, short-letter format; not yet confirmed in a larger trial.

Source: Bhattacharyya S, Appiah-Kusi E, Wilson R, et al.. Effects of cannabidiol on symptoms in people at clinical high risk for psychosis. World Psychiatry. 2024;23(3):451-452. DOI 10.1002/wps.21253 · PubMed 39279373

CBD research

Established

Critical aspects affecting cannabidiol oral bioavailability and metabolic elimination, and related clinical implications

Population
Review of human pharmacokinetic studies
Product
Cannabidiol in general (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Review
Finding
Taken by mouth while fasting, only about 6% of a CBD dose is estimated to reach the bloodstream; a high-fat meal increases this about fourfold. Much of each dose is broken down by the liver before reaching the circulation.
Limitations
Review of other CBD preparations; figures vary between studies.

Source: Perucca E, Bialer M.. Critical aspects affecting cannabidiol oral bioavailability and metabolic elimination, and related clinical implications. CNS Drugs. 2020;34:795-800. DOI 10.1007/s40263-020-00741-5

CBD research

Established

A Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, multiple dose, and multiple dose food effect trial of the safety and tolerability of highly purified cannabidiol in healthy subjects

Population
Healthy adult volunteers
Product
Purified CBD oral solution (not NWPT-SM32300)
Design
Phase 1 randomised, placebo-controlled trial
Finding
Described the safety and tolerability of single and repeated doses of purified CBD in healthy adults, and found that a high-fat meal increased CBD exposure.
Limitations
Healthy volunteers; a different CBD product. A published correction exists.

Source: Taylor L, et al.. A Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, multiple dose, and multiple dose food effect trial of the safety and tolerability of highly purified cannabidiol in healthy subjects. CNS Drugs. 2018;32:1053-1067. DOI 10.1007/s40263-018-0578-5 · PubMed 30374683

Programme-specific

Programme-specific

Programme information

A Phase 1 study to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of novel cannabidiol (CBD) soft-gel capsule formulation (NW300EMCBD) in healthy subjects

Population
14 healthy adult volunteers aged 18 to 55
Product
NWPT-SM32300 600 mg and 900 mg; Epidyolex comparator
Design
Randomised, open-label, three-period crossover; single doses
Finding
Completed December 2025. Results not yet published.
Limitations
Healthy volunteers, single doses: measures absorption and short-term tolerability, not effectiveness in clinical high risk of psychosis.

Source: NWPharmaTech Ltd (sponsor). A Phase 1 study to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of novel cannabidiol (CBD) soft-gel capsule formulation (NW300EMCBD) in healthy subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07186283; ISRCTN25163383. 2025. DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN25163383

Corrections

No corrections have been made since publication.

Corrections log.

Review history

Evidence reviews
DateReviewMethod
initial verificationSearch-engine summaries of publisher, PubMed, registry and official pages